PDA

View Full Version : megane-3-95160 dash



billykillkelly
20th January, 2012, 02:33 PM
hi can anyone calculate megan3 95160 dash & abs pls org value 95042 i need 70123 thanks in advance....

blackpirate
20th January, 2012, 04:16 PM
abs only
Download 70117.bin from Sendspace.com - send big files the easy way (http://www.sendspace.com/file/pwubnc)

pinkfloyd5eg
20th January, 2012, 08:03 PM
Also try this, the dash dump adjusted to 70123km

A correction for the attached dump >>

address of first byte of mileage at (0000x70 - 0A)

70123km can be :

14 EE EB 11 01 00 14 EE EB 11 01 00 14 EE EB 11 01 00 14 EE EB 11 01 00

or

string#1 15 EE EA 11 01 00
string#2 14 EE EB 11 01 00
string#3 17 EE E8 11 01 00
string#4 16 EE E9 11 01 00

billykillkelly
21st January, 2012, 10:11 AM
i dont think its gonna work(( thx anyway.....

captain crackers
21st January, 2012, 10:51 AM
the mileage is at 07A to 091. 70123 is 14 EE EB 11 01 00 repeated four times. Arthur.

blackpirate
21st January, 2012, 11:41 AM
abs file 100% ok! :)

billykillkelly
21st January, 2012, 11:47 AM
car is not here ill try on monday thx all you guys for the help)))

cotymoto
21st January, 2012, 07:01 PM
hi what software you use for reprogram, i have tachosoft, nyo04 and licznik, but not see renault megane 3 , i hope you message thankyou

captain crackers
21st January, 2012, 07:09 PM
I used my brain. This is not a calculator, it is something that is lodged in my skull. Arthur.

PremierD
21st January, 2012, 07:11 PM
The old (ish) grey matter.exe ...

pinkfloyd5eg
21st January, 2012, 11:40 PM
i dont think its gonna work(( thx anyway.....

hi mate, I tried that algo for 2 different dumps of meganeIII 95160 dash, and it showed correct km for both dumps +40km. but I didn't try it on a car!!

plz don't forget to share the result...
good luck.

captain crackers
21st January, 2012, 11:59 PM
Pinkfloyd, part of your algo is correct but you missed out the not of EB 11 which is 14 EE and put 01 02 instead of 01 00. Also you started at 07C instead of 07A. It is an algo used by Johnson controls and is accurate to 1 km. not 40. Arthur.

pinkfloyd5eg
22nd January, 2012, 12:07 AM
Pinkfloyd, part of your algo is correct but you missed out the not of EB 11 which is 14 EE and put 01 02 instead of 01 00. Also you started at 07C instead of 07A. It is an algo used by Johnson controls and is accurate to 1 km. not 40. Arthur.

thanks mate, I noticed we have some different bits, and this is why I mentioned that I have 40km different however on this dump on this thread, it showed me only 1km different, so I thought it would be fine, but my question here, if he uses my dump with 40km , will this cause error on dash cause it will have km different than the ABS ??

thanks for your reply :adore:

captain crackers
22nd January, 2012, 12:19 AM
Pinkfloyd, your kms are correct EB 11 01 but you missed the not of EB 11. If you look at the original dump at 07A, BD 8C is the not of 41 73 followed by 01 00. The kms. being 41 73 01. !00% your dump will not work. Arthur.

PremierD
22nd January, 2012, 01:19 AM
I would hazzard a guess Captain .. pinky .. uses a calc .. and not a Pencil lol

pinkfloyd5eg
22nd January, 2012, 01:29 AM
Pinkfloyd, your kms are correct EB 11 01 but you missed the not of EB 11. If you look at the original dump at 07A, BD 8C is the not of 41 73 followed by 01 00. The kms. being 41 73 01. !00% your dump will not work. Arthur.

OK MATE, I got your point but still something unclear yet, mileage bytes on the original dump are not repeated as they are along the string, I meant look at those bytes (41 73 then changed to 42 73 next 3F 73 ... etc) and this ofcourse will give different NOT results each time, so if you repeated (14 EE EB 11 01 00 repeated four times) will be not the same algo (sequence) as the original dump yet !!!

hope you could understand my horrible english lol

paul_12345
22nd January, 2012, 01:34 AM
OK MATE, I got your point but still something unclear yet, mileage bytes on the original dump are not repeated as they are along the string, I meant look at those bytes (41 73 then changed to 42 73 next 3F 73 ... etc) and this ofcourse will give different NOT results each time, so if you repeated (14 EE EB 11 01 00 repeated four times) will be not the same algo (sequence) as the original dump yet !!!

hope you could understand my horrible english lol

I've never even done a mileage correction apart from a few obd, but doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.. look at the first one

mileage-1 then
mileage
mileage-3
mileage-2

each one changing the 'checksum' too

pinkfloyd5eg
22nd January, 2012, 01:55 AM
I've never even done a mileage correction apart from a few obd, but doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.. look at the first one

mileage-1 then
mileage
mileage-3
mileage-2

each one changing the 'checksum' too

I wanted to say that repeating 14 EE EB 11 01 00 for4 times as mentioned by "captin cracker" should be also not ok ??

what you explained is obvious ,so checkum also should be considered while modification not only repeating the above string each time as it is ??

NOW IT SHOULD BE LIKE THIS:
string#1 15 EE EA 11 01 00
string#2 14 EE EB 11 01 00
string#3 17 EE E8 11 01 00
string#4 16 EE E9 11 01 00

paul_12345
22nd January, 2012, 02:35 AM
I wanted to say that repeating 14 EE EB 11 01 00 for4 times as mentioned by "captin cracker" should be also not ok ??

what you explained is obvious ,so checkum also should be considered while modification not only repeating the above string each time as it is ??

I get what you mean. I seen a few examples here that don't need to follow the pattern as per the original for the repeats, I assume it must chose the highest one so it doesn't matter ????

captain crackers
22nd January, 2012, 09:56 AM
I can assure you, it is ok to put it in the same 4 times but you can step it 4 times, as long as you step it correctly. This algo is only repeated 4 times and is quite simple to step but when you come to an algo that is repeated 50 times, you will have a lot of working out if you want to step it all the way through. Arthur.

pinkfloyd5eg
22nd January, 2012, 03:13 PM
I can assure you, it is ok to put it in the same 4 times but you can step it 4 times, as long as you step it correctly. This algo is only repeated 4 times and is quite simple to step but when you come to an algo that is repeated 50 times, you will have a lot of working out if you want to step it all the way through. Arthur.

Thanks for your help mate, I added an edition to my previous post which had the attached modified dump, to be used by our friend "billykillkelly"

billykillkelly
23rd January, 2012, 10:24 AM
I wanted to say that repeating 14 EE EB 11 01 00 for4 times as mentioned by "captin cracker" should be also not ok ??

what you explained is obvious ,so checkum also should be considered while modification not only repeating the above string each time as it is ??

NOW IT SHOULD BE LIKE THIS:
string#1 15 EE EA 11 01 00
string#2 14 EE EB 11 01 00
string#3 17 EE E8 11 01 00
string#4 16 EE E9 11 01 00
all calcs are shows 999999..((((:(

captain crackers
23rd January, 2012, 11:51 AM
Put in FFFF 0000 0000 4 times. that is the algo for zero ie. a new cluster. If it still shows 999,999 you have another problem, possibly a corrupted original dump. If it shows zero miles, the algo I gave you is wrong.
By the way it is the same algo as the Renault Modus/Scenic C56 but different locations. Check with your calculators to see what they give but remember some give the algo bytes reversed. Arthur.

pinkfloyd5eg
23rd January, 2012, 01:05 PM
all calcs are shows 999999..((((:(

please try this attached dump as it is without making any changes ??
if didn't work also, then please review the ABS dump, make changes for first 7 bytes on line 0000x50 ONLY , and restore bytes on lines 00D0 and 00E0 to thier original values.

yzfr1
24th January, 2012, 01:19 PM
Finally solved..Thanks To MY BRO and all you guys...

billykillkelly
24th January, 2012, 05:35 PM
may be it's time to get retired... buy a little farm by the sea fishing and drink beer all day o more errors no more 999999 no more immo lock im realy thinking abaut this)))

pinkfloyd5eg
24th January, 2012, 05:57 PM
may be it's time to get retired... buy a little farm by the sea fishing and drink beer all day o more errors no more 999999 no more immo lock im realy thinking abaut this)))

what happned mate, please tell us, have you got it solved ?? more details please before retiring , by the way, I am already retired looooooooong time ago lol lol lol

billykillkelly
24th January, 2012, 07:24 PM
this was my bro's job who is yzfr1))) he is expert on the to find the trouble jobs)))

mouaoued
28th May, 2012, 01:13 AM
hello thank you very much all
that will help me for my megane III dash is 44507km I ve presents the 24507 km

thank you

mouaoued
31st May, 2012, 12:21 AM
hello hello hello

mouaoued
31st May, 2012, 08:02 PM
hello thank you very much all
that will help me for my megane III dash is 44507km I ve presents the 24507 km

yzfr1
31st May, 2012, 08:33 PM
just try it if is not working get back to me..

hdano
15th December, 2021, 04:31 PM
Hi,

can you please change my dash of fluence 95160 from 139784 to 84389 ?
After replacing faulty ABS my dash shows wrong info.
I already injected dump from old ABS into new (second hand) ABS.
Dash should be JohnsonControls.
Thank you !